I’m leading a workshop today for the Investigative Reporters and Editors conference on using unnamed sources.
I’ll discuss points made in posts about using unnamed sources, including one on persuading people to talk for the record about difficult topics (and my 20-years-later CJR piece about one of the sources) and another on using information from unnamed sources to persuade other sources to talk for the record. I also will talk about the importance of power and eagerness in granting confidentiality, and suggest we should not quote spokespeople for powerful people and organizations without using their names.
I also mention a couple of posts by others about email encryption for journalists.
Here are my slides for the workshop:
And here are some tweets from the session:
2 q's for a source who wants to be unnamed: Will I talk to them at? Will I use what they say? Lower bar for former. @stevebuttry #ire2016
— Lindsay Beyerstein (@Beyerstein) June 18, 2016
Great, easy tip from @stevebuttry on making it clear to sources they're on the record. First Q should be: How do you spell your name? #IRE16
— reedkath (@reedkath) June 18, 2016
Demonstrate your drive for accuracy. Make your source realize: S/he's really serious about this shit! @stevebuttry #ire2016
— Lindsay Beyerstein (@Beyerstein) June 18, 2016
Steve Buttry says when sources don't want to go on record, ask them to provide documents that corroborate stories #IRE16
— James Barragán (@James_Barragan) June 18, 2016