I’m pleased that the Society of Professional Journalists is considering an update to its Code of Ethics.
The SPJ Code of Ethics has guided journalists for decades, but hasn’t been updated since 1996. I called for an update in a blog post nearly three years ago, then in a follow-up cover story for Quill magazine and discussed the need for an update in an #spjchat Twitter chat. I applaud new SPJ President David Cullier for calling on the Ethics Committee to consider an update.
In a discussion Sunday at the Excellence in Journalism conference, SPJ Ethics Chair Kevin Smith and some other Ethics Committee members acknowledged a need for at least some fine-tuning, though some said they did not see the need for heavy revisions.
I won’t belabor here the points I’ve made before, but I’ll summarize briefly. The journalism landscape has changed dramatically since 1996 and I think the need for an update is clear and compelling. The code offers little to no guidance for journalists on digital issues such as linking or personal use of social media. The “act independently” section offers little to no guidance for self-employed journalists covering areas in which they have personal interests or those working for organizations involved in advocacy or with direct interests in the topics they cover. The code is silent in the debate over the proper role of opinions in journalism.
SPJ played an important role in journalism by updating its code in 1996. It should play a similar role now, inviting several journalists involved with the challenges of digital journalism and changing business models to join the Ethics Committee in updating the code. You can contribute to the discussion by answering the committee’s online questions.
The need for extensive updating was most dramatically underscored by a young journalist (and I apologize for not getting her name) who said during Sunday’s discussion that the SPJ Code doesn’t provide guidance for the issues she faces. If the code isn’t helpful to such journalists, it needs to be updated, period.
I will repeat here a suggestion I made Sunday, when those minimizing the urgency of an update were saying the code offers timeless principles (an oversimplification in my view), but the Ethics Committee has offered more detailed advice on various timely issues. The SPJ Code is not hyperlinked at all on the organization’s website. Links within the code to relevant elaboration by the Ethics Committee would be a valuable help to journalists while the committee considers whether and how to update the code itself.
I should also express appreciation here for the new book, The New Ethics of Journalism: Principles for the 21st Century, by Kelly McBride and Tom Rosenstiel. I intend to read and review the book, but haven’t had time yet. I was involved last fall when Kelly and Tom led a discussion on developing new guiding principles for journalism ethics, and I made some suggestions for Poynter’s new guiding principles.
I applaud Poynter and SPJ for recognizing the need to continue providing current, relevant leadership in journalism ethics.
Thanks to everyone who attended today’s town hall meeting on revising the ethics code. Lots of great suggestions. Moving forward, #EIJ13
— Kevin Z Smith (@SPJethicschair) August 26, 2013
The McBride-Rosenstiel book makes a major contribution and includes an excellent updated code of ethics for journalists. We reviewed it here: http://talkingethics.com/2013/08/18/book-review-the-new-ethics-of-journalism/ Look forward to your review.
LikeLike
[…] SOCIETY of Professional Journalists dos EUA vai rever o seu código deontológico. A mais recente versão do código foi adoptada em […]
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Journalism, Journalists and the World and commented:
It is always good to have a discussion of how to word basic rules of journalism — including what it means to be ethical.
The SPJ Code has been translated into a number of languages and has proved to be a powerful guide for journalists around the world who are trying to improve the quality of journalism in their home countries. I have seen journalists and news organizations in the Dominican Republic, China and Hong Kong use the SPJ Code as the basis for their own codes. (That means they were dumping the weak or non-existent codes in their area.)
LikeLike
[…] The Society of Professional Journalists is reconsidering its Code of Ethics, which also dates from the ’90s. I’m pleased that Kelly will be involved in that effort, and I hope SPJ will address some of the issues she and Tom didn’t. […]
LikeLike
[…] Society of Professional Journalists is considering an update to its Code of Ethics. I was part of a group making recommendations relating to digital journalism (more on that […]
LikeLike
[…] the Journalist, the Verification Handbook project, Verification Junkie and an effort to update the Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics. I called for more detailed ethics discussions and welcomed a guest post from Tom Kent of the […]
LikeLike
[…] Journalists Code of Ethics. I called for an update to the SPJ code in 2010 and I am pleased that SPJ is finally considering an update. I was part of a digital subcommittee headed by Mónica Guzmán that made recommendations to the […]
LikeLike
[…] a discussion at the Excellence in Journalism conference last August, several members of the Society of Professional Journalists Ethics Committee indicated they thought […]
LikeLike
[…] Journalists’ code of ethics: time for an update? […]
LikeLike