Most news stories are basically data in paragraph form.
Each of the 5 W’s could just as easily be a field in a database. Structured as data, not simply as stories, “who” becomes more than a fact for a story; it relates this story to the other stories with the same “who.”Databases give news content more lasting value, by providing context and relationships.
I don’t have a lot more to say about this right now. I just mention it because Michelle Minkoff makes similar points in a post about some data projects she worked on for the Los Angeles Times: We must understand our news content as data.
I won’t elaborate, beyond encouraging you to read her post. It reminded me of a post by Dan Conover: The “Lack of a Vision” thing? Well, here’s a hopeful vision for you.
For a further understanding of the value of data for journalism, I also recommend:
Rivers of Data by Derek Willis (also linked and recommended by Minkoff).
Be the Answer, my 2008 report on interactive databases for the American Press Institute‘s Newspaper Next project.
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Steve Buttry, Bill Garber and NewsFuturist.com, Michelle Minkoff. Michelle Minkoff said: More on how data can/should influence how we structure journ, check out @stevebuttry's new post: http://bit.ly/cfmk70 Hadn't seen these yet. […]
LikeLike
[…] Databases. I blogged yesterday about how journalists need to start thinking of news content as data. […]
LikeLike
[…] she worked on there and need to collaborate around news as data. As TBD’s Steve Buttry wrote, “Each of the 5 W’s could just as easily be a field in a database. … Databases give […]
LikeLike
[…] Great advice on seeing news content as data […]
LikeLike