You might find some valid research in the Navigating News Online study published Monday by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a project of the Pew Foundation. But the study needed lots of context that an organization committed to excellence in journalism should provide. For instance:
Archive for the ‘Media issues’ Category
5 big problems with ‘Navigating News Online’ study
Posted in Media issues, Twitter, tagged Facebook, Navigating News Online, Nielsen, Project for Excellence in Journalism, Twitter on May 10, 2011 | 16 Comments »
Pew doesn’t understand news ecosystem well enough to study it
Posted in How News Happens, Innovation in the media, Journalism, Media issues, tagged astrogirl's galaxy guide, Baltimore, Baltimore Sun, Fox News, Friends of The Senator, How News Happens, Jim Cramer, Jon Stewart, Laura Serena, Mark Potts, Pew Research Center, Project for Excellence in Journalism, Sean Hannity, Senator Theatre, The Daily Show, Tom Rosenstiel on January 16, 2010 | 34 Comments »
Note: I have added an update, in bold below, since originally posting this. A study of Baltimore news sources was more deeply flawed than I initially realized. I blogged Monday about weaknesses in the How News Happens study by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism and about the misinterpretation of the report [...]
Old media find comfort in study of Baltimore media (they didn’t look very close)
Posted in Breaking news, How News Happens, Innovation in the media, Media issues, Twitter, tagged Bill Mitchell, blogging, David Carr, How News Happens, Los Angeles Times, Mark Potts, New York Times, Pew Research Center, Poynter, Project for Excellence in Journalism, Twitter on January 11, 2010 | 35 Comments »
I followed this up with a subsequent post on Saturday, Jan. 16. The reaction to How News Happens may tell us more about the news industry than the study itself does. The study of the news ecosystem in Baltimore was published today by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism, and news of [...]
Publishers optimistic for 2010 (but they missed 2009 by a mile)
Posted in Complete Community Connection, Media issues, Mobile opportunities, tagged Alan Mutter, C3, Kubas Consultants, newspaper advertising on December 18, 2009 | 2 Comments »
Whew! Publishers are expecting the plunge in newspaper advertising revenues to level off next year. Maybe now we can stop the bleeding and not feel so much pressure to change. Or can we? Alan Mutter wrote yesterday of the publishers’ projections in his Reflections of a Newsosaur blog, asking, What the heck are publishers thinking? [...]
Time for journalists to update views on Wikipedia
Posted in Accuracy, Ethics, Media issues, tagged accuracy, Brittanica, John Seigenthaler, journalism ethics, Lucy Holman Rector, Mark S. Luckie, Wikipedia on October 16, 2009 | 13 Comments »
Journalists pride ourselves in being accurate and on being current with the latest news. So let’s update our inaccurate views of Wikipedia. A 10,000 Words post by Mark S. Luckie today offers lots of good advice for reporters on pleasing their editors, including this piece: Fact-check your stories. Any editor worth their salt will inevitably ask [...]
Newspapers blow a huge opportunity to use data to provide answers
Posted in Innovation in the media, Journalism, Media issues, tagged Aaron Ritchey, Adrian Holovaty, Alan Mutter, American Press Institute, American Society of Newspaper Editors, Bill Adair, Carol Napolitano, chicagocrime.org, David Milliron, EveryBlock, Fast Company, Gannett, Greg Reeves, Jennifer LaFleur, Knight News Challenge, Matt Waite, Michael Gluckstadt, MSNBC, National Institute of Computer-Assisted Reporting, Newspaper Next, Paul Goodsell, PolitiFact, Pulitzer Prize, Shawn McIntosh, Washington Post, Zack Kucharski on August 18, 2009 | 5 Comments »
Journalists love stories. Give us a good anecdote and we know what our lead is going to be. We’re not as comfortable with data. We know a good story is hiding in there somewhere, but most of us don’t know how to find it. And too many of us — reporters and executives alike — [...]
AP contradiction: Move forward but restore
Posted in Media issues, tagged Associated Press, Nieman Journalism Lab, Zach Seward on August 14, 2009 | 7 Comments »
When I read the Associated Press “Protect, Point, Pay” plan, I think of the Hummer. General Motors thought it was moving forward when it trotted out the massive sport-utility version of a military vehicle. The Hummer represented a lot of smart work by a lot of engineers and GM sold a lot of Hummers. It [...]
Does AP plan “protect” its members?
Posted in Media issues, tagged American Press Institute, Associated Press, Dean Singleton, George Frink, Mitch Pugh, Nieman Journalism Lab, Sioux City Journal, Tom Curley, Zach Seward on August 12, 2009 | 1 Comment »
The Associated Press is giving me an uneasy feeling again. I want to read the full AP “Plan for Reclaiming Content Online” for myself before I draw firm conclusions. I first read of it at the Eastern Iowa Airport this afternoon on the Nieman Journalism Lab blog entry by Zach Seward. Zach acknowledges that he’s [...]
Accuracy is more important than ever for journalists
Posted in Accuracy, Ethics, Journalism, Media issues, tagged accuracy, Alessandra Stanley, Clark Hoyt, Jayson Blair, Judith Miller, New York Times, verification, Walter Cronkite on August 3, 2009 | 4 Comments »
Accuracy has always been right at the top of the list of journalism values and priorities. Except when I saw friends lose their jobs (and sometimes, had to deliver that news myself) or had to write about horrible tragedies, the sickest feelings I have had in this business were when I got my facts wrong. [...]


