<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why does Bill Keller write about Facebook without trying to understand it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/</link>
	<description>Steve Buttry, Digital Transformation Editor, Digital First Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reviewing 2012, my busiest blogging year &#171; The Buttry Diary</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-38546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reviewing 2012, my busiest blogging year &#171; The Buttry Diary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-38546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] nearly 7,000 views. A couple of other posts about Facebook topped 800 views &#8212; one noting that Bill Keller wrote about it without understanding it and one clarifying whether newsrooms are allowed to post Associated Press photos on Facebook or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nearly 7,000 views. A couple of other posts about Facebook topped 800 views &#8212; one noting that Bill Keller wrote about it without understanding it and one clarifying whether newsrooms are allowed to post Associated Press photos on Facebook or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My blog traffic slowed down when my writing slowed down, but increased syndication may have given me a record &#171; The Buttry Diary</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-17096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My blog traffic slowed down when my writing slowed down, but increased syndication may have given me a record &#171; The Buttry Diary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 23:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-17096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the pattern changed in June. My post about Bill Keller’s ignorance about Facebook has had 787 views on-site, but 1,895 syndicated views. And the syndicated views have topped their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the pattern changed in June. My post about Bill Keller’s ignorance about Facebook has had 787 views on-site, but 1,895 syndicated views. And the syndicated views have topped their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why some in news love Twitter and some apparently don’t &#171; News Worldwide</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-16716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why some in news love Twitter and some apparently don’t &#171; News Worldwide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-16716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why does Bill Keller write about Facebook without trying to understand it? (stevebuttry.wordpress.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why does Bill Keller write about Facebook without trying to understand it? (stevebuttry.wordpress.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Buttry</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-16687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Buttry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-16687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nooooo! I love the three-word policy, John. It covers stupid snarkiness without needing elaboration. Some snarkiness is just fun and worth keeping as part of the social-media conversation (OK, maybe I&#039;m trying to justify my own snarkiness).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nooooo! I love the three-word policy, John. It covers stupid snarkiness without needing elaboration. Some snarkiness is just fun and worth keeping as part of the social-media conversation (OK, maybe I&#8217;m trying to justify my own snarkiness).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnlrobinson</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-16686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnlrobinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-16686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good editor looks at a writer&#039;s grammar, facts and tone. Seems to me that a good editor would question him more closely to make sure his opinions are supported...and advise him to remove the sarcasm and snideness from his email responses to fellow journalists.

I&#039;m thinking I need to change my social media policy to read, &quot;Don&#039;t be stupid or snarky.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good editor looks at a writer&#8217;s grammar, facts and tone. Seems to me that a good editor would question him more closely to make sure his opinions are supported&#8230;and advise him to remove the sarcasm and snideness from his email responses to fellow journalists.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking I need to change my social media policy to read, &#8220;Don&#8217;t be stupid or snarky.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina D. (@designerGNA)</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-16682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gina D. (@designerGNA)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-16682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found Storify&#039;s vision &quot;statement&quot; posted earlier today an interesting complement to this discussion, so I thought I&#039;d add it here: http://storify.com/storify/our-vision

Cheers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found Storify&#8217;s vision &#8220;statement&#8221; posted earlier today an interesting complement to this discussion, so I thought I&#8217;d add it here: <a href="http://storify.com/storify/our-vision" rel="nofollow">http://storify.com/storify/our-vision</a></p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Buttry</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-16678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Buttry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 02:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-16678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Certainly, covering things we can&#039;t learn firsthand is part of journalism. In the agriculture example I used, I visited farms but didn&#039;t actually learn how to farm (and some writers who knew farming wrote more authoritatively than me). 

But here&#039;s where your comparison falls apart: Space journalists could go into space, but they worked their asses off to understand their topic, and I&#039;m sure the best spend (or spent, since we don&#039;t cover space nearly as much now) considerable time in Houston &amp; Cape Canaveral, learning as much as they could about space. A few thousand people in NASA were more knowledgeable them but they made the effort to understand &amp; wrote authoritatively to the general population. 

But learning about Facebook is not only possible but easy. A half billion people, probably more, know more about Facebook than Bill Keller. So he shows his ignorance to most of his audience. When you can&#039;t learn firsthand, you need to work hard to learn by less effective means. Keller passed on learning firsthand and then read or talked to a few people who agreed with him. I stand by my assessment that that was lazy journalism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly, covering things we can&#8217;t learn firsthand is part of journalism. In the agriculture example I used, I visited farms but didn&#8217;t actually learn how to farm (and some writers who knew farming wrote more authoritatively than me). </p>
<p>But here&#8217;s where your comparison falls apart: Space journalists could go into space, but they worked their asses off to understand their topic, and I&#8217;m sure the best spend (or spent, since we don&#8217;t cover space nearly as much now) considerable time in Houston &amp; Cape Canaveral, learning as much as they could about space. A few thousand people in NASA were more knowledgeable them but they made the effort to understand &amp; wrote authoritatively to the general population. </p>
<p>But learning about Facebook is not only possible but easy. A half billion people, probably more, know more about Facebook than Bill Keller. So he shows his ignorance to most of his audience. When you can&#8217;t learn firsthand, you need to work hard to learn by less effective means. Keller passed on learning firsthand and then read or talked to a few people who agreed with him. I stand by my assessment that that was lazy journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urho Kekkonen</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-16676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Urho Kekkonen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-16676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Buttry, your fiery argument seems to be that only such journalists who have been to space should be allowed to write about space exploration. Silly me, I always thought that part of the journalistic work involved covering themes that (quite often) are alien to the poor journalist put on the assignment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Buttry, your fiery argument seems to be that only such journalists who have been to space should be allowed to write about space exploration. Silly me, I always thought that part of the journalistic work involved covering themes that (quite often) are alien to the poor journalist put on the assignment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal Davis</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-16673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hal Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-16673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it Luddite nitpicking to note that Keller misused &quot;affect&quot; in this sentence? 

 &quot;It should not be immune from scrutiny for its affect on the culture or for its behavior as a business.&quot;

But that may go to the issue of less editing in the digital side of the force.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it Luddite nitpicking to note that Keller misused &#8220;affect&#8221; in this sentence? </p>
<p> &#8220;It should not be immune from scrutiny for its affect on the culture or for its behavior as a business.&#8221;</p>
<p>But that may go to the issue of less editing in the digital side of the force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Buttry</title>
		<link>http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/why-does-bill-keller-write-about-facebook-without-trying-to-understand-it/#comment-16659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Buttry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/?p=8547#comment-16659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope you noticed that he did, Kurt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you noticed that he did, Kurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
